-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
Revert "Inconsistent indexes for tick label plotting (#28733)" #39235
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
This reverts commit fb379d8.
doc/source/whatsnew/v1.2.1.rst
Outdated
@@ -12,6 +12,10 @@ including other versions of pandas. | |||
|
|||
.. _whatsnew_121.regressions: | |||
|
|||
We have reverted a commit that resulted in several plotting related regressions in pandas 1.2 (:issue:`38969`, :issue:`38736`, :issue:`38865`, :issue:`38947` and :issue:`39126`) | |||
|
|||
As a result, bugs reported as fixed in pandas 1.2 are again present (:issue:`26186` and :issue:`11465`) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would move this below the list of regressions below? (now it's not under the "Fixed regressions" title)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we didn't actually 'fix', but will defer to you on documentation layout.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The regressions are still fixed, no? (although tests are not yet added, I am assuming this fixed the regression reports)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see your point. I sort of meant we didn't fix
as we broke other things. but maybe regression section is more appropriate than the introductory sentences.
doc/source/whatsnew/v1.2.0.rst
Outdated
@@ -751,6 +751,7 @@ Plotting | |||
|
|||
- Bug in :meth:`DataFrame.plot` was rotating xticklabels when ``subplots=True``, even if the x-axis wasn't an irregular time series (:issue:`29460`) | |||
- Bug in :meth:`DataFrame.plot` where a marker letter in the ``style`` keyword sometimes caused a ``ValueError`` (:issue:`21003`) | |||
- Bug in :meth:`DataFrame.plot.bar` and :meth:`Series.plot.bar` where ticks positions were assigned by value order instead of using the actual value for numeric or a smart ordering for string (:issue:`26186`, :issue:`11465`) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe add something here like: This fix has been reverted in pandas 1.2.1, see :doc:`v1.2.1`
"
Co-authored-by: Joris Van den Bossche <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Joris Van den Bossche <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Joris Van den Bossche <[email protected]>
thanks @simonjayhawkins |
@meeseeksdev backport 1.2.x |
Something went wrong ... Please have a look at my logs. |
…ing (#28733)" (#39252) Co-authored-by: Simon Hawkins <[email protected]>
This reverts commit fb379d8.
reverts #28733
cc @nrebena @jreback @WillAyd @charlesdong1991
just the complete revert for now for ci testing, will add commits for release notes. will NOT add regression tests see #38721 (comment)